The arrest of an American businessman in Russia echoes the Khodorkovsky and Browder episodes from the early 2000s.
Having written about countless high-profile arrests in Moscow in the past—whether of an acting federal minister, a winner of European film festivals, an acting senator, two billionaire brothers, or a governor—I thought that nothing could surprise me. I was wrong. Last week, Russia exceeded my expectations again. Michael Calvey, an American investor and citizen, and founder of the major private equity fund Baring Vostok, was arrested by the Russian security services, the FSB. Five other Baring Vostok managers were arrested as well.
But maybe it shouldn’t have surprised me. After all, the Calvey case was in many ways all too familiar. It was reminiscent of Russia in the early 2000s during the early phase of Vladimir Putin’s rule. They say history is cyclical. Or maybe, as Marx had it, it repeats, first as a tragedy, second as farce. In Russia’s case, perhaps it is more a downward spiral: when events do repeat, they only get worse.
Over 25 years of operating in Russia, Baring Vostok had invested over $2 billion in 55 Russian companies, all in the private sector. Ironically, the arrest of its top executive took place right before the opening of the Russian Investment Forum in Sochi on February 13. Three days later, a Moscow court put Calvey in jail for two months to await trial.
Officially, Calvey is charged with perpetrating a multi-million dollar fraud. In reality, this means he had made an enemy of someone with connections. If in 1990s economic rivals were targeted by hitmen, by the 2000s that job had fallen to the siloviki. And rather than assassinations, the preferred weapon for stripping rivals of their assets became criminal prosecutions. Some insiders say it costs as little $50,000 these days to order a criminal case opened against a competitor.
The details of the Calvey case—and they are worth diving into—suggest that paid-for justice was at play. The key relationship is between Calvey and one Artem Avetisyan, a member of the Russian Strategic Initiatives Agency, a nonprofit governmental organization with Vladimir Putin as chairman of its board. The fight is officially over the valuation of assets used to settle debts between Calvey’s Baring Vostok and a bank co-owned by Calvey and Avetisyan. In reality, it is a struggle over control over the bank itself—Vostochny—which is currently the 32nd largest bank in Russia if measured by assets.
Beyond having links to Putin himself, Artem Avetisyan is apparently also a good friend of Dmitry Patrushev, the son of Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev, and is said to have done business with Vladislav Surkov, the sons of the former head of the Presidential Administration Alexandr Voloshin, and the son of the CEO of Sberbank German Gref. With these kinds of connections, having the siloviki intervene on your behalf can’t have been too difficult.
Unlike his colleagues, Michael Calvey was not immediately put in jail after his arrest. In his initial court appearance, he professed to “believe in the Russian justice system”—a period of hope that lasted for three days, before the court decided to jail him. It’s only then that a public outcry from the business community began.
Audit Chamber head Alexey Kudrin pulled together the courage for a tweet: “Obviously, the President’s directive not to arrest people on economic charges is being violated. I consider this particular situation an emergency to the economy.” Surely there must be some mistake here, the former Finance Minister protested—without daring to address Russia’s President directly.
It took Arkady Volozh, the billionaire founder of the Russian search engine Yandex, two days after the arrest to speak up in defense of Calvey. Baring Vostok invested in Yandex back in 2000, buying 35 percent of its shares for $5.28 million. When it sold its share, Baring Vostok made more than $1 billion off the deal. Volozh, who has suffered from a hostile intervention by Sberbank and Putin’s crony Alisher Usmanov, said that Baring Vostok “has always been the standard of decency and law obedience for the market.”
It also took two days for Russia’s Presidential Commissioner for Entrepreneurs’ Rights, the billionaire Boris Titov, to publish an op-ed in Vedomosti with the bold title “Why Michael Calvey Should Not be in Jail.” The article’s content, alas, was not so bold. Titov wrote about Calvey as if this was the first time a businessman has been put in jail on such trumped-up charges—as if the Yukos case and Mikhail Khodorkovsky’s ten years in prison had been memory-holed into oblivion.1 He wrote, too, as if the charges against Calvey were a genuine mistake by the prosecutor’s office rather than a paid-for operation conducted by the siloviki—as if these same siloviki were not hounding American-born investor Bill Browder up to the present day.
Khodorkovsky and Browder, both victims in the early 2000s, were admittedly slightly different cases. They both were harassed by the government in the interest of the government—Khodorkovsky for his pretensions to political power (which endangered Vladimir Putin) and Browder for connecting the dots between a group of federal officials that stole money from the Russian budget (in the interest of Vladimir Putin).
And yet when Khodorkovsky and later Browder were thrown under the bus, those who could have spoken up preferred not to, probably hoping that both cases were so extraordinary that they would not happen again. But of course, things have only gotten worse since then. Whether it is Igor Sechin ordering a criminal case against Vladimir Yevtushenkov over the oil company Bashneft, or the case of Minister Ulyukaev, countless targeted prosecutions have been initiated by interested parties with ties to the siloviki.
Calvey should have been no surprise.
When Calvey was detained and his arrest was being decided in court, to me his initial release was surprising while his final arrest seemed quite natural. To everyone else, apparently, it was the opposite; it was more comforting to think that Calvey would not go to jail and would merely be placed under house arrest or have his travel restricted (seen as light punishment in Putin’s Russia). These same people think that if Calvey were to drop a lawsuit he has outstanding against Avetisyan in London, his case will be closed. Perhaps Calvey would have to give away some of his assets, too, these people say, and then everything else could go back to “normal”.
This, too, is deja vu. The movers and shakers in Russian high society are always one step behind the escalating brazenness of Putin’s government. The way they defended Michael Calvey clearly shows that they still hope that a “mistake” will be acknowledged and fixed when the Good Czar Putin hears about the outrageous Baring Vostok case.
But the Kremlin has made it very clear that there was no mistake. Commenting on the Calvey case, Putin’s Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that “Putin and Calvey met a number of times,” that “the Kremlin closely watches the development of the case,” but that “it is a matter for law enforcement” and that the Kremlin won’t intervene. Peskov added that “this could happen in any country with any businessman,” before expressing hope that the Calvey case “won’t affect the investment climate in Russia.”
The truth is, Russia has long been on a trajectory to a place where the siloviki are free to do whatever they want and the Kremlin won’t stop them. As Russian analyst Vladimir Milov noted, Calvey himself was no naif, and his Baring Vostok had for years “worked well as loyal cogs in Putin’s machine,” validating the premise that Putin was some kind of pro-business modernizer rather than a mafia don. Still, Russia’s business elites pretend that this is not the world they live in, or hope that it won’t go much further.
But the idea that this won’t affect more people—whether they are Russians or Americans, investors or political opposition figures, ministers or film directors—is at best cynical, and at worst hopelessly naive.
1 Incidentally, the Calvey case is being reviewed by the same Basmanny Court in Moscow that sentenced Khodorkovsky and gave the world the term “Basmanny justice” as a shorthand for corrupt, politicized justice in Putin’s Russia.
Karina Orlova is the Washington correspondent for Echo of Moscow radio, and a contributing writer for The American Interest.
Published on: February 21, 2019
After Moldova’s elections in February, the country’s leading oligarch, Vladimir Plahotniuc, thought he had things sewn up. While the Russian-leaning Socialists won the most seats, 35, in the 101-seat Parliament, Plahotniuc’s Democrats had won 30 seats and the pro-E.U. ACUM...( ) Read all
Russia is to keep its membership in Europe’s top human rights body after Germany and France engineered a last-minute deal to avoid a Russian expulsion, a step that threatened to further incite tensions between the Kremlin and the West.( ) Read all
Today we commemorate the genocide of the Crimean Tatar people. 75 years ago, as being allegiadly ‘unreliable’, all of the Crimean Tatar population was deported from its Homeland. The Lithuanian Constitutional Court has referred to the acts against the Crimean Tatar people as a...( ) Read all
March 18 marked a year since Russia’s last presidential election. Vladimir Putin allegedly won 76.69% of the vote, on a turnout of 67.54% (or 51.7% of all Russia’s eligible voters.) But a recent study of video recordings from polling stations paints quite a different picture of...( ) Read all
The campaign of Volodymyr Zelensky, a forty-one-year-old actor who, on Sunday, was elected Ukraine’s next President, in a landslide, was light on specifics. He vowed to put an end to corruption and the trade of political favors for illicit wealth, and also to bring peace to the...( ) Read all
The radio station brought to light Victor Josu, a pro-Russian who is helped by Valeriu Pasat, the ex director of the Service of Information and Security to promote Russia's politics in Moldova. In 2010, Victor Josu was intensively supporting a further organization of a referendum to support the...( ) Read all
Katie Bowman, a PhD in electrical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, specialized in a very fine part of building complex and precise algorithms that could create images through a huge data stream of up to 5 million gigabytes, and then completed her specialization at...( ) Read all
Today's press conference of the Socialist Party of the Republic of Moldova, informally led by the Moldovan President, Igor Dodon, supports the suspicion that his undeclared and denied plan to place the country under Russian control exists and is still in motion.( ) Read all
Time flies. 15 years have passed since Lithuania‘s accession to NATO. Once, NATO membership seemed completely out of Lithuania‘s reach. Today, we proudly consider ourselves to be experienced and reliable members of the Alliance.( ) Read all
When Benito Mussolini debuted the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento, the precursor to his fascist party, on Mar. 23, 1919, in Milan, he wasn’t inventing the idea of violent authoritarianism. But he put a name on a new and terrible breed of it. Under his leadership, squads of militants...( ) Read all
On this day five years ago the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation adopted - over one night - the decision (opinion) that allowed for the annexation of a part of Ukrainian territory - the Crimean penninsula. Thus, the decision of 19 March 2014 contributed to the commission of an act of...( ) Read all
BUDAPEST — The International Investment Bank, an obscure Russian financial institution with a small-time balance sheet, is an unlikely source of global intrigue. In more normal times, its plans to open a new headquarters in Budapest would pass unnoticed.( ) Read all
WASHINGTON, DC – Last week, Congressmen Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) and Bill Keating (D-MA) introduced H.R. 1616, the European Energy Security and Diversification Act, to help both the United States and European countries attain global energy security while also encouraging a...( ) Read all
Latvia has finished construction of the 93-kilometer-long section of the fence with the barbed wire on the border with Russia. Kristina Petersone, the press secretary of Latvian State Border Guard said that as quoted by Diena.( ) Read all